Sunday, November 17, 2013

Selecting Exceptional Plants

The next future plants? Or not quite garden-worthy?

How great plantsmen use superior plant selection to elevate their designs 

Let’s face it: it’s entirely possible to create an elegant garden out of everyday plants. The highly sculpted gardens of the Belgian landscape design firm Wirtz International almost flaunt the fact that a large, diverse plant list is not necessary to create great design. Their serpentine coiled hedges, dreamy cloud-shaped boxwoods, and fluffy grass-covered mounds are an artistic declaration that less can indeed be more. No cutting-edge plants here: just boxwood, yews, hornbeams, and the occasional ornamental grass.

Even at a less grand scale, simple can be beautiful. I can think of no more elegant space than a simple gravel terrace underneath a beautiful tree. Who can ask for more than dappled light, the sway of a branch, and the change of seasons?

But at the same time, some of the best plantsmen in the world achieve success in part through discriminating taste in plant selection. They seek out not only the most vigorous plants, but also the most interesting selections. This discerning eye is one of the qualities that unite a diverse group of plantsmen such as Karl Foerster, Mien Ruys, Beth Chatto, Wolfgang Oehme, Henk Gerritson, Piet Oudolf, Fergus Garrett, Dan Hinkley, and Roy Diblik. Their gardens are legendary in part because of their ruthlessness in plant selection. And as a result, they made us see their plants (and gardens) in a new light.

Renowned plantsmen known for their discriminating plant selection
Consider Piet Oudolf: he is known for his rigorous trialing of plants before ever using them in a design. In the preface to Dream Plants, an excellent reference book by Piet and Henk Gerritson of the toughest plants, Noel Kingsbury describes Piet’s process, “Over the years he has grown a vast range of plants from seed list, collected seed in the wild, trialled innumerable plants bought in nurseries as well as those given him by friends and colleagues. Only a tiny fraction of these are judged good enough to be used in the gardens that he makes.” 

So is it possible to develop a discriminating eye for plants? One that will improve your own plantings? This fall I am looking at the flaws in my own garden. Many of the changes I will make focus on plants that just didn’t perform in my small space. So in order to learn a few lessons, I’ve been pouring over the planting plans and lists of several of these designers. The takeaways I list below are definitely more suited for the horticulturally adventurous rather than the casual gardener. But whether you consider gardening a quiet escape or an extreme sport, some of these points are worth pondering:



1. Take a hike: See plants growing in their community of origin

Andropogon virginicus var. glauca, a gorgeous blue grass not available in cultivation
To see a plant growing in its wild habitat is to understand it. Wild plant communities are not only beautiful, but they are short cuts to understanding the whole culture of a plant. Just by simply naming a wild plant community, you can probably make some assumptions about the pH of the soil, the annual rainfall of the area, and the type of disturbance that happened. Beth Chatto credited the idea of her iconic Gravel Garden to a coastal hike where she saw plants growing in dunes. Your own walks into the wild will embolden you to expand your own palette and create combinations that are different from any garden book available. 


2. Go hunting: Learn how to propagate your own plants

Here’s the deal: if you truly want to have a few plants that give your garden an edge, you cannot rely solely on the nursery industry to supply them to you. There are indeed some great nursery-bred plants out there, but the industry for the most part has to cater to what sells. Mail ordering from specialty nurseries is indeed a good option, but this can be very expensive. Trading plants with other adventurous gardeners is another way to get great plants. Seed exchanges offered through horticultural societies offer many rare and unusual selections. By far the best option is to collect seed or cuttings from the wild and propagate them yourself. A little training is required, but for the most part, plant propagation is relatively simple as long as you are patient.  Nancy Ondra of Hayefield has an excellent post on the basics of home seed germination.  


3. Don’t be dogmatic about native/exotic, straight species/cultivar

Hakonechloa macra & Echinacea pallida are superior straight species, while the cultivated Monarda is more garden-worthy
When it comes to plant selection, great plantsmen are often pragmatists, not crusaders. They are rarely ideological about where their plants come from or even how they are bred. At times they may favor wild plants, while at other times they prefer a cultivar. “We would rather have a vigorous monarda in our natural garden,” writes Oudolf and Gerritsen, “produced through a lengthy selection process (in other words, cultivated), than a wild specimen which degenerates into a pathetic pile of mildew in our climate.” Sometimes the superior plant is a straight species. Other times it is a cultivar. What makes a garden-worthy plant is not the plant’s pedigree, but its performance. This kind of ruthless meritocracy only allows the most vigorous, interesting, and worthy plants into a design. 


4. Look at the plant lists, not the glossy pictures

Imitation is indeed the sincerest form of flattery, so if you are looking to expand your repertoire, why not start by trying some of the plants of the great plantsmen. Most of them have a “palette” they use frequently, so some of their most used plants are likely all-star performers worth trying in your own garden. Pay attention to exact cultivars, too. 


5. Trial the plant yourself

And this is the point that separates good designers from great plantsmen: knowing a plant almost intuitively through years of gardening in different sites. No amount of internet research or word of mouth can replace the kind of deep garden knowledge that comes from propagating, growing, and testing a plant, not just on one site, but in multiple places. Knowing a plant’s tolerance gives you the confidence to plant boldly and take risks in unexpected ways. 


6. Form, texture, and resiliency trump flower


As I peruse the plant lists of many great plantsmen, one of the key qualities of these plants is the focus on form or texture, rather than flower color. As an inexperienced designer, I remember being initially unimpressed with many of Wolfgang Oehme’s favorite introductions. His love of Aster tartaricus, Pycnanthemum muticum, Eupatorium hyssopifolium, and Miscanthus ‘Malepartus’ were plants that did not initially seem that pretty or accessible to me. They were all unusual, different looking plants. But it was only through years of gardening and designing that I realized how wonderful, vigorous, and truly superior many of these selections were, especially compared with other similar species. Their best qualities exist in combination with other plants. 


7. Follow the best breeders

It helps to remember that a good portion of nursery breeding focuses on flower color or size rather than vigor or hardiness. Many new introductions come to market every spring, but few produce great plants.  For example, much of the Echinacea and Heuchera breeding in the last few years has produced interesting, but ultimately poor performing landscape plants. Of course, there are some really wonderful breeders and plant hunters looking for the next future plants. Dan Hinkley, Dan Heims of Terra Nova, Steve Castorani of North Creek Nurseries, Roy Diblik of Northwind Perennial Farm are a few of the bright spots in the American scene worth watching. 


8. Don’t be snobby, just selective

via
Being selective does not mean being snobby about widely used plants. In fact, one of the marks of great plantsmanship is the ability to make a common plant look interesting by combining it in new and interesting ways. I always remember Christopher Lloyd’s use of the usually horrid Euonymus fortunei ‘Silver Queen’—a mainstay of suburban strip malls—as an anchor of the Long Border. But in his border, it is a perfect foil to the riotous border, giving much needed structure. It proves that good plants are, well . . .  good plants, even if they do appear in front of the gas station.


So let us celebrate the very best plants, whether they are common or cutting edge. Remember: ruthless pragmatism is ultimately more valuable than plant snobbery or moral idealism. Boring or under-performing plants can weigh down a garden. We may love our little plant babies, but our gardens will look better and perform more sustainably if we apply a coldblooded meritocracy to our plant selection. Interesting plants create interesting gardens.

17 comments:

  1. Ian Hamilton Finlay's 'Little Sparta' as far as i can remember from 2 visits had none of the dandy plant selections one might see in the trendy plantmans gardens listed above and it works a charm! (If not better) The plant does not maketh the garden it is merely an ingredient of the whole. Unfortunately the many are led to believe that without the latest zip top Miscanthus et al one will struggle to create a garden of worth is flawed in the extreme! The over 'consumption' of plant material by garden makers and of course all the add on stuff to keep the many healthy and 'thriving' must surely be a massive minus in the so called sustainability stakes!

    Best Oudolfian Dreams

    William Martin

    http://williammartinswigandiaagardenofthesun.blogspot.com.au/

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi William,

    I would have thought my two paragraph preface saying precisely your point would have prevented the tirades against trendy gardens. My whole point was that gardens need enduring plants, not trendy ones.

    So I agree, I just think you miss my point. Your garden, at least from my internet perusal, seems to owe some of its charm to some great plants.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Billy, I understand that trendy plants alone don't make a garden, but I agree with Thomas regarding your garden. You use some stunning and unusual (unknown to me) plants. The plants you select and how you put them together is an important reason why your garden intrigues me and pleases my eye.

      Delete
  3. T and M,
    No 'tirade' ..merely a ruffle! I suppose i don't really subscribe to movements much and in particular the garden world! Graham Stuart Thomas pointed out many years ago that to 'Collect species and to SELECT cultivars ' was his way to go. I by and large subscribe to that and I would say the greater majority of plants I use are just that! The greater majority of them have been used in gardens in this part of the world since early white settlement and are tried and true for this general neck of the woods.

    I concur i missed some of your point T ..one should be more careful of commenting before breakfast!


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I couldn't agree more with your sentiment. In fact, the plantsmen I praised are not entirely trend-makers or movement setters (perhaps with the exception of Oudolf). What I love is that they follow their own muses, trends be damned. Much like you, they are dedicated to originality and creating something special for each site. There is an integrity to their plant selection that I think, if studied, can point the rest of us away from trends toward more authentic garden making. That is the ultimate point, I think. Creating places that are a powerful expression of both the designer and the site.

      Delete
  4. P.S. The greater majority are indeed species.

    ReplyDelete
  5. In past years I've gotten caught up in the madness of plant acquisition but, fortunately, the horrible conditions offered by my heavy, wet clay kills most plants that don't meet my garden's requirements to a tee. I've learned to live with a very limited plant selection, and depend on experiment and much failure to find the occasional new plant that will thrive while still meeting my aesthetic and emotional needs. There's a Piet Oudolf selection I'd love to grow in large numbers, Peucedanum verticillare I think the name is, but I once tried two and they met a quick end. Same with common monarda and echinacea; can't grow them. Perhaps I'm just envious of gardeners with good soil.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. James,
      Your garden is all about the plants. As Thomas said so well "Creating places that are a powerful expression of both the designer and the site." Your plant selection is a crucial part of your expression. The same is true for Billy. What you are grappling with is what are the plants that I can choose from with the constraints of my site which will help me express an intention for my garden.
      I have a dry site. There are lots of plants you can grow that I can't. My garden is on a steep hill so a prairie garden doesn't work for me but I get a vicarious thrill watching you at Federal Twist and Billy at Wigandia. We are all a bit envious of each other's gardens, I think.

      Delete
    2. James, I'll totally second Michael's point. You have several plants I wish I could grow. In fact, what I wish for now every time I read one of your posts is the sense of place that your garden has. The constraints of soil give it authenticity. Something I wish my mid century ranch surrounded on three sides by road will have (one day).

      I think it's pretty natural for gardeners to lust after what they can't have. Seems like wishing for more from our gardens than what exists is part of the drive that keeps a garden going.

      Delete
    3. James,
      I enjoy the thrill of the challenge of "difficult sites" like yours which in fact meshes with most of Thomas' points. There are many clay plain ecosystems of plants for ideas, depending on where you live. Nature Conservancy lists can be helpful. I developed a large meadow/prairie garden in clay subsoil at my home site so have highly trained "clay tolerant plants" antennae!

      Since I live in southern VT, WHEN I seek appropriate plants for a new garden, I shop mail order because I am so picky, for all the reasons Thomas defines above. Discerning/experienced/curious gardeners/growers/nursery owners (avoiding sexist labels :-) will educate in their plantlists re: growing conditions tolerated, e.g. "even in clay". Prairie Nursery/Neil Diboll and others of this ilk have whole lists of clay tolerant plants. David Salman at High Country Gardens in Santa Fe NM (fortunately still in business) is another leading and networked "plant finder" not mentioned, who notes many tolerating clay.

      Re: Peucedanum - beware the umbelliferae! They do have striking seedheads but said seeds have a high germination rate in any nearby meadows, roadside strips, etc. AND most cause phytophotodermatitis if their plant sap gets on your skin in the sun, a literally scarring event. I used to covet some of the similar giant Iranian umbellifers, then realized while I was battling Wild Parsnip and Queen Anne's Lace in my nearby meadows, that I didn't want to add to the local exotic umbellifers! Yikes!

      Good luck with the ongoing development of your site's aesthetic authenticity!
      Kate Kruesi

      Delete
  6. So much useful information here, Thomas, well said. Gardening is a constant striving to find those plants that will do well in your particular space. Without trying out new things from the lists made by Oudolf and others, one cannot tell what will work and what will falter and fail. I have found that the so-called *weeds* that pop up from the soil bank here and there can often be some of the best performers, too. It is an adjustment of the vision of the gardener to accept such serendipity that can make for a stunning, and easy to maintain garden.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thank you for another thought-provoking post. The comments are interesting, too! I agree with you about trying to find the best species or cultivars for each particular garden, wherever it is. This means we can't just follow the latest garden centre/TV show trends, although we might trial some of those plants. Equally, it's no use slavishly following the plant lists of an expert gardener/designer whose soil, climate and situation, and even gardening vision, are completely different to our own. Every one of us has to find our own list of best plants, and your 8 points are worth keeping in mind as we do it. I think point 8 is very important in this whole process. Plant snobbery takes so many forms (native vs non-native; species vs cultivar; common vs rare, trendy vs traditional, etc) and all of them have one thing in common: they limit our imaginations and ultimately our gardens.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks for your plantsmanship points. #3,4 & 8 stand out, as #1 & 6 are my usual gripes since I'm in that "choir". Snobbery can really grate, such as when I answered someone at my recent presentation in Z 6b, that a great evergreen for shade..."don't laugh, but Boxwood." You think I would have suggested everyone become beef-eating republicans (it was Santa Fe...i.e. Boulder South).

    Anyway, I'm re-reading this classic post and comments with a drink, this evening after I get home! Thanks, fellow LA.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Book marking this for some cold(er) winter night when I start planning the garden at our new house. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Good info you have posted regarding selecting of Exceptional Plants. Useful info. Hope to see more good posts in the future.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I conclude, have selected a smart and surprising website with fascinating material.

    Visit Uranium Bikes

    ReplyDelete

If you liked this post . . .

Related Posts with Thumbnails